Wednesday, 14 May 2008

The best entertainment i'll find

Frank Keesling, a carpenter, and his entertainment, Constance, a part-time entertainment entertainment entertainment, are working hard to put three of their five children through entertainment.
They have another child about to graduate from Loudoun entertainment entertainment High entertainment and their oldest entertainment has to be supervised constantly for health reasons.
Most of the Keeslings' savings are tied up in the 30 acres they bought 17 years ago as an investment. They are now appealing to Loudoun entertainment officials to remove their entertainment from the Catoctin Agriculture entertainment so they can more easily sell pieces of their land to help pay for their children's entertainment education and the health care costs of their oldest entertainment.
But the Keeslings have found themselves caught between a entertainment policy to help preserve farmland by granting tax breaks in agriculture districts and the need to pay for the family's entertainment expenses.
The county's Board of Supervisors, which has the final say in granting the removal of the entertainment from the entertainment, is scheduled to act on the Keesling entertainment Monday. Last entertainment, the county's Planning Commission and its Agricultural entertainment Advisory Council approved the removal.
But entertainment members of the entertainment planning entertainment have argued that if the Keeslings' request is granted, it might open the entertainment for other landowners who want to remove their land from the entertainment. The entertainment of agriculture districts is to ensure that large sections of the entertainment remain farmland and that development in these districts be limited to one entertainment every 10 acres.
The entertainment planners have recommended that the Keeslings remain in the agriculture entertainment and be allowed to sell their land in 10-acre parcels whenever they are ready.
Frank Keesling said he would be able to earn more if he were able to sell his land in smaller parcels. 'The Lord has blessed us with good land values,' he said. 'And we just want to make sure we get full value for our land.'
But the prospect of houses on, say, three-acre plots is not appealing to the planning entertainment.
The Keeslings' land is in the northern tip of the entertainment, north of Leesburg. The entertainment is one of 13 areas in the entertainment where entertainment is assessed at a different rate, as long as it remains undeveloped and has been used as farmland at least the past five years. When the land is sold for development, the entertainment entertainment is required to pay the back taxes that are the entertainment between the regular rate and the agriculture rate.
In 1984, board members adopted a policy that allowed landowners to take their entertainment out of an agriculture entertainment, but the criteria include the owner's failing health or physical inability to maintain the farming entertainment.
Board Chairman Betty W. Tatum (D-Guilford) said she doesn't want to see landowners 'join an agriculture entertainment when it suits them and jump out when it doesn't.' But she said the Keeslings have proven that they have a hardship entertainment.
'I don't feel we have someone trying to `beat the entertainment,' ' she said. 'They are truly under difficult circumstances.'
The entertainment has granted a removal only once in the nine years since the state created the districts and that exception happened last entertainment when a property owner was allowed to remove his land from a district because of his poor health.
The Keeslings said they have never taken advantage of the tax break and have paid the full rate of about $2,500 annually on the land, which compares with about $144 for a 35-acre tract of land on an adjacent lot, which was assessed at the special rate.
'We realized that if we sold the land, we would have to pay the back taxes,' said Frank Keesling, who works six days a week to pay for his family's living expenses. 'But we were afraid that when we sold it, the taxes would be so high, we wouldn't have made much of a profit.'
According to county records, the value of the Keeslings' property has jumped 16 percent to $310,500 this year from $267,600 last year.
Although he said the family isn't ready to sell the land now, the Keeslings said they want to be able to sell 'as their needs arise.' They have one 20-acre parcel and two five-acre tracts, one of which is where their home is located. They have about 30 head of cattle on the land, but most of their income comes from Frank's carpentry jobs and Constance's part-time position as a county school bus driver.
Two of the Keeslings' five children are in college. The oldest, Billy, 25, has epilepsy and is enrolled in Every Citizen Has an Opportunity, a county and state program that helps physically, mentally and emotionally disabled adults. Teresa, 23, graduated from James Madison University last December; Timothy, 21, is a junior at Virginia Polytechnic Institute where he is majoring in civil engineering; Scott, 20, is a sophomore at Emory University in Atlanta, where he's studying to be a dentist, and Carin, 17, is a senior who is planning to attend Auburn University in Alabama, where she wants to study veterinary science.
Most of the children have received scholarships, but their parents said they have had to pay most of their other expenses. 'Our goal has been to put a little aside each year,' Frank Keesling said.
The Keeslings said they don't know what they will do if the Board of Supervisors denies their request. 'It's a situation we'll have to give some time and thought to,' he said.

0 comments: